|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Des Rob. Schroeders Fototechnikseiten |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Olympus E-P1 High-ISO RAW vs. JPEG |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Olympus E-P1 High-ISO Comparison RAW vs. JPEGTest setup:
The E-P1 used was a
presentation model with firmware level 1.0, said to be
pre-production.
The camera was shot
(RAW+JPEG) with the Olympus Zuiko Digital 50mm 1:2 Macro, hand-held
and not avoiding blur, so sharpness is not something to be judged
here. The RAW files were patched to identify the camera as the E-30
in order to make the RAW converter accept the file and force it to
use the E-30 profile. Sorry, since I was only interested in the RAW
results at first, I can't say what the noise reduction and sharpness
settings on the camera were I just didn't care as I was
shooting.
RAW files were developed with
Silkypix Developer Studio 3 using optimized parameters for
'Sharpness' and 'Noise reduction' for each ISO setting, based on my
personal defaults for the E-30.
The complete field of fiew:
The crops:
ISO RAW JPEG 800 1600 3200 6400 Conclusion: The new JPEG engine
works wonders, not only but especially with the blotchy chroma noise
which never was quite extinguishable until now, neither in the
earlier JPEG engines nor with even the extensive NR features of a RAW
converter like Silkypix. This is a significant progress, and I wonder
whether Silkypix will one day incorporate a similarly effective NR
algorithm.
RS 01-Jul-09
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|