|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Des Rob. Schroeders Fototechnikseiten |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Olympus E-P1 RAW Image Quality (Low-ISO) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Olympus E-P1 RAW Image Quality (Low-ISO) Compared to The Olympus E-30Test setup:
The E-P1 used was a
presentation model with firmware level 1.0, said to be
pre-production.
Both cameras were shot with
the Leica Summilux 25mm 1:1.4, hand-held but supported, at ISO 100,
f/8 and 1/320 s.
The E-P1's RAW file was
patched to identify the camera as the E-30, too, in order to make
the RAW converter accept the file and force it to use the same
profile as for the E-30.
Both RAW files were then
developed with Silkypix Developer Studio 3 using default parameters
except for 'Sharpness' (45/85/90/Pure detail), 'Noise reduction',
which was effectively turned off (0/0/0/100/0), and 'Demosaic sharp'
(50), and CA correction for the lens.. (Side note: my impression is
that in addition to whatever difference these results may or may not
show, in contrast to the E-30, 'Demosaic sharp' can be significantly
increased for the E-P1 without risking sharpening artifacts.) The
RAW files were developed to TIFF and crops were taken and saved as
minimally compressed JPEGs.
This is the complete field of
fiew:
And here are the crops:
E-P1 E-30 This is a crop of an underexposed
area, brightened by +3 EV:
E-P1 E-30 Conclusion: The E-P1, which
basically uses the same sensor chip as the E-30, is (if only just)
slightly sharper than the E-30, and it shows noticeably less noise at
ISO 100, while delivering near-identical images otherwise, when
developing RAWs using identical parameters. So whatever differences
the out-of-camera JPEGs show (which are, as other reports have shown,
even more significant), there already are some differences in the
sensor itself. Not all image quality improvements come from the new
JPEG engine alone.
If we take into account that the
E-P1 RAW can probably use a higher 'Demosaic sharp' setting and can
be more intensely sharpened through the standard sharpness settings,
too, before noise becomes too much, there will probably be a
significant sharpness advantage over the E-30 (looking at it on pixel
level, and whatever it will mean for the usual applications).
RS 01-Jul-09
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|